BIG BLUE FANS FOR

BASKETBALL


To the 2010-11 Offensive Rebounding Efficiency

ACTUAL FINAL GAME STATISTICS
AND EFFICIENCY A
NALYSES

A New Feature for the "Last Game" page introduced during the 2008-09 season.
The following charts provide an overview of the season long performance of this team.

Offensive and Defensive Efficiency Trends
Adjusted NGE Trends

By Game Number


To the 2010-11 Offensive Rebounding Efficiency

 

  1. All Games
  2. All Games-D1 [No Exhibitions]
  3. Home
  4. Away
  5. Neutral Court
  6. Non-Conference
  7. SEC
  8. RPI Top 50
  9. RPI Over 50
  10. Post Season Play
  11. Games Since Louisville Game
  12. SEC Tournament

 

 

IMPORTANT NOTE: In 2009-10, the Kentucky basketball team's rebounding became so dominant in the first 10 games that the differences created by a varied definition of a possession became substantial, and based on a 10 game comparison of predicted and actual results using the original definition and the Pomeroy definition, I have decided to start using the Pomeroy definition for a possession beginning with the 2009-10 season, and thereafter. However, I have no means to convert the data for all prior seasons to this new definition at this time. Therefore, any attempts to compare pace and efficiency derived values for 2009-10 and later with any prior season's posted values will fail. The differences are:

1. Pace values will be lower, by the number of offensive rebounds.

2. Efficiencies will be higher due to the lower number of total possessions

3. Turnover rates will be higher due to the lower number of possessions.

CHECK OUT THESE OTHER ANALYTICAL WRITINGS

What Is Basketball?

What is a Possession?

Change in Position on Definition of Possessions

What Is Net Game Efficiency?

Why Do "Upsets" Occur?

Do Objective Performance Measures Like NGE
Account For Intangible?

 

Go Back

Copyright 2006 - 2009
SugarHill Communications of Kentucky
All Rights Reserved