BIG BLUE FANS FOR

BASKETBALL

 

ANALYSIS OF KENTUCKY BASKETBALL
WITH TEAM AVERAGES FROM 2000 THROUGH 2015
AND COMPARED TO 1996 CHAMPIONSHIP QUALITY

 

Go Back

 

SEC TOURNAMENT BRACKETS AND PROJECTED RESULTS
BASED ON FINAL SEC STANDINGS
AND REGULAR SEASON ANE

SEC STATISTICS AND TOURNAMENT SEEDING

SUMMARY OF PREDICTED V ACTUAL GAME BY GAME RESULTS

FIRST ROUND GAMES-PROJECTED

 

SECOND ROUND GAMES-PROJECTED

 

QUARTER FINAL GAMES-PROJECTED

 

SEMI-FINAL GAMES-PROJECTED

 

CHAMPIONSHIP GAME-PROJECTED


To Data Tables for Games Against Team Ranked Pomeroy Top 50

The above data is presented in the next series of tables providing more detail in two respects.  First, the tables examine more categories of statistics, and second, the data is sorted based on the following factors, in the order shown below:

  1. All Games, Including Exhibitions
  2. All Games-D1 [No Exhibitions]
  3. Home
  4. Away
  5. Neutral Court
  6. Non-Conference
  7. SEC
  8. Pomeroy Top 50
  9. Pomeroy Over 50
  10. Post Season Play
  11. Games Since Louisville Game, 2003-2012
  12. SEC Tournament Gateway
  13. NCAA Tournament

You may link to any of these sorted data pages using the links above, or you can browse them in sequence using the "Continue" buttons at the bottom of each page.

 

IMPORTANT NOTE: In 2009-10, the Kentucky basketball team's rebounding became so dominant in the first 10 games that the differences created by a varied definition of a possession became substantial, and based on a 10 game comparison of predicted and actual results using the original definition and the Pomeroy definition, I have decided to start using the Pomeroy definition for a possession beginning with the 2009-10 season, and thereafter. However, I have no means to convert the data for all prior seasons to this new definition at this time. Therefore, any attempts to compare pace and efficiency derived values for 2009-10 and later with any prior season's posted values will fail. The differences are:

1. Pace values will be lower, by the number of offensive rebounds.

2. Efficiencies will be higher due to the lower number of total possessions

3. Turnover rates will be higher due to the lower number of possessions.

CHECK OUT THESE OTHER ANALYTICAL WRITINGS

What Is Basketball?

What is a Possession?

Change in Position on Definition of Possessions

What Is Net Game Efficiency?

Why Do "Upsets" Occur?

Do Objective Performance Measures Like NGE
Account For Intangible?

 

 

Go Back

Copyright 2013
SugarHill Communications of Kentucky
All Rights Reserved